Okay, to some extent the title is misleading and a lie. Actually, your review can matter, but for the most part, the majority of people who sit down and write these reviews are biased in one form or another.

'Oh no, D!' you say to me. 'I'm very open minded about my games!'

Yes, well Confucious said that 'If a mind is too open, everything falls out.' This is exactly the problem we're facing in gaming nowadays. People are open minded, liberal and will take ANYTHING the industry gives them.

I digress. Back to the original topic...

I don’t know if it’s the servers I play on or what, but it looks to me that 90% of the people playing tf2 are playing for their individual scores.  Maybe it’s because I play mostly on pubs because I don’t really feel like joining a clan.  Some of us actually want to win the game and it makes me want to jam rusty Phillips head screw drivers into my eyeballs when someone is only playing for themselves.

Just last weekend I was dead and in spec mode watching a demo-man standing next to the payload on Gold rush shooting out his little bombs at some sniper sitting up in the sniper nest, not killing him of course.  Mean while 2 scouts and a medic pushed the cart right past this retard to win the game.  All he had to do was turn around and bomb the cart so I could respawn and actually help out the team to WIN THE GAME.  That’s what it’s about isn’t it? Winning the game? You’d think it was, but apparently not.

Chris Deering (Google him. He's a douche that I don't care explaining.) says that in order for the video game industry to survive, the games themselves need to cost more. I say 'Bullshit.'

Gaming companies can mullygrub and complain all they want about not making enough money for their company to survive and piracy, but what about us, the consumers? We have to put UP with your crappy games that you hawk at us for 50-60 bucks apiece brand new!

I try and play Atlantica Online, but there are so many things about it that are just flat out irritating.  They took a bunch of really good ideas and then twisted them with buggy, non-intuitive programming.

I just don't get it, I feel like it's been done 1000 times before.  The playstation eye for one.  Everytime I mention that, someone jumps down my throat "Oh no, it's not the same thing."  I beg to differ, it's a camera that captures your movements and interprets that into functions that allow you to do operations.   I think I saw this same thing 15 years ago in a mall as a kid with a digital projector. 

Ground breaking my ass. Please someone prove me wrong before I have an aneurysm.